You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
南部の発想の源を求めて:なぜ最後に流体力学か
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Butsuri, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.11316/butsuri.72.4_236 |
| Authors |
菅本 晶夫 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 7 | 25% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,210,583
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Butsuri
#72
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,509
of 324,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Butsuri
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.