You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the fMRI investigation of autism spectrum disorders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.10.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ruth C.M. Philip, Maria R. Dauvermann, Heather C. Whalley, Katie Baynham, Stephen M. Lawrie, Andrew C. Stanfield |
| Abstract |
Recent years have seen a rapid increase in the investigation of autism spectrum disorders (ASD) through the use of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). We carried out a systematic review and ALE meta-analysis of fMRI studies of ASD. A disturbance to the function of social brain regions is among the most well replicated finding. Differences in social brain activation may relate to a lack of preference for social stimuli as opposed to a primary dysfunction of these regions. Increasing evidence points towards a lack of effective integration of distributed functional brain regions and disruptions in the subtle modulation of brain function in relation to changing task demands in ASD. Limitations of the literature to date include the use of small sample sizes and the restriction of investigation to primarily high functioning males with autism. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 658 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 1% |
| Unknown | 625 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 130 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 100 | 15% |
| Researcher | 92 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 76 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 49 | 7% |
| Other | 100 | 15% |
| Unknown | 111 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 213 | 32% |
| Neuroscience | 87 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 3% |
| Other | 81 | 12% |
| Unknown | 154 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,474,452
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
#654
of 4,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,783
of 154,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.