↓ Skip to main content

A new tobamovirus infecting tomato crops in Jordan

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 4,252)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
patent
18 patents
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
193 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
Title
A new tobamovirus infecting tomato crops in Jordan
Published in
Archives of Virology, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00705-015-2677-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. Salem, A. Mansour, M. Ciuffo, B. W. Falk, M. Turina

Abstract

In this study, we completed the whole genome sequence of a new tobamovirus isolated from tomato plants grown in greenhouses in Jordan during the spring of 2015. The 6393-nt single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) genome encodes four proteins, as do other tobamoviruses: two replication-related proteins of 126 kDa and 183 kDa, a 30-kDa movement protein (MP) and a 17.5-kDa coat protein (CP). Phylogenetic analysis showed that this virus does not group with either the tomato mosaic virus (ToMV) or the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) clades. Instead, it stems from a branch leading to the TMV clade. Analysis of possible recombination events between this virus and representative isolates of closely related tomato-infecting tobamoviruses showed that at least one region originated by recombination. We provide evidence that we have identified a new tobamovirus, for which we propose the name "tomato brown rugose fruit virus".

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 183 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 16%
Student > Master 28 15%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 7%
Other 8 4%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 66 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 69 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 14%
Unspecified 4 2%
Chemistry 4 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 68 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,339,024
of 23,549,388 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#47
of 4,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,799
of 389,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#2
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,549,388 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,252 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.