↓ Skip to main content

Association of the rs1611115 polymorphism in DBH gene with Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Sciences, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Association of the rs1611115 polymorphism in DBH gene with Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis
Published in
Neurological Sciences, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10072-018-3543-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shan Kang, Mingxia Bi, Xixun Du, Qian Jiao, Hong Jiang

Abstract

A meta-analysis was performed to assess the association between the dopamine beta-hydroxylase (DBH) rs1611115 genetic polymorphism and Parkinson's disease (PD). A comprehensive search was conducted to identify all case-control or cohort studies. The fixed or random effect-pooled measure was selected on the basis of a homogeneity test among studies. Heterogeneity among studies was evaluated using the I2. We performed sensitivity analyses to evaluate the robustness of the results. Publication bias was estimated using Egger's linear regression test. Five case-control studies corresponded to the inclusion criteria comprising 3926 patients and 3542 controls which were included in the present meta-analysis. Our meta-analysis showed no significant association between DBH rs1611115 genetic polymorphism and risk of PD in the codominant (REM, OR = 1.017, 95%CI = 0.854-1.210), dominant (REM, OR = 0.989, 95%CI = 0.826-1.185), and recessive (REM, OR = 1.007, 95%CI = 0.657-1.542) models. Moreover, in the subgroup analysis based on region (Asia and Europe), no significant associations were observed in Asia or Europe. This meta-analysis suggests that the DBH rs1611115 genetic polymorphism might not be associated with PD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 13%
Neuroscience 2 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%