Title |
Complex Biotic Interactions Drive Long-Term Vegetation Change in a Nitrogen Enriched Boreal Forest
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ecosystems, October 2009
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10021-009-9287-8 |
Authors |
Annika Nordin, Joachim Strengbom, Åsa Forsum, Lars Ericson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sweden | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 43 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 25% |
Student > Master | 8 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 41% |
Environmental Science | 9 | 20% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 2% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 14 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2015.
All research outputs
#5,559,757
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#448
of 1,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,281
of 108,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,396 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.