↓ Skip to main content

Clinical benefits of introducing real-time multiplex PCR for cerebrospinal fluid as routine diagnostic at a tertiary care pediatric center

Overview of attention for article published in Infection, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Clinical benefits of introducing real-time multiplex PCR for cerebrospinal fluid as routine diagnostic at a tertiary care pediatric center
Published in
Infection, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s15010-018-1212-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Eichinger, Alexandra Hagen, Melanie Meyer-Bühn, Johannes Huebner

Abstract

Sepsis-like illness with suspected meningitis or encephalitis is a common reason for using empiric antimicrobial therapy in infants and children. However, in cases of viral meningitis not covered by these antimicrobials, this management is ineffective and due to side effects potentially harmful. A retrospective analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) multiplex PCRs (Biofire FilmArray®) in children with clinical suspicion of meningitis, encephalitis or sepsis-like illness was performed over the period of 1 year. Subsequently, a subgroup of children (age of 8-84 days of life) diagnosed with viral meningitis (enterovirus, HHV-6, human parechovirus) was compared to an age-matched control group. During the study period, the multiplex PCR panel was performed on 187 individual CSF samples that met the inclusion criteria. About half of the patients (92/187) were less than 1 year of age. In 27 cases (14.4%), the PCR yielded a positive result with the majority (12/27) being indicative of an enteroviral infection. In the age group of 8-84 days of life, 36.4% of the patients had a positive result. When the patients with a PCR positive for a viral agent were compared to an age-matched group of patients, no differences were observed regarding symptoms and laboratory parameters. However, the duration of antimicrobial therapy could be significantly reduced through the use of multiplex PCR. The use of on-site diagnostic multiplex PCR was able to reduce the use of antimicrobials in selected cases. This test can guide clinical decisions earlier during the course of medical care compared to standard diagnostics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 69 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 18 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 21 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2019.
All research outputs
#20,532,290
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Infection
#1,257
of 1,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,461
of 335,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection
#24
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.