↓ Skip to main content

When is it appropriate to combine expert judgments?

Overview of attention for article published in Climatic Change, June 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
When is it appropriate to combine expert judgments?
Published in
Climatic Change, June 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf00140244
Authors

David W. Keith

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Israel 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
South Africa 1 3%
Unknown 30 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 38%
Researcher 11 32%
Other 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Computer Science 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Other 9 26%
Unknown 6 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2009.
All research outputs
#7,576,061
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Climatic Change
#5,088
of 5,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,374
of 27,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climatic Change
#22
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,829 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.