↓ Skip to main content

Making healthy eating and physical activity policy practice: process evaluation of a group randomized controlled intervention in afterschool programs

Overview of attention for article published in Health Education Research, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Making healthy eating and physical activity policy practice: process evaluation of a group randomized controlled intervention in afterschool programs
Published in
Health Education Research, November 2015
DOI 10.1093/her/cyv052
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. Glenn Weaver, Michael W. Beets, Brent Hutto, Ruth P. Saunders, Justin B. Moore, Gabrielle Turner-McGrievy, Jennifer L. Huberty, Dianne S. Ward, Russell R. Pate, Aaron Beighle, Darcy Freedman

Abstract

This study describes the link between level of implementation and outcomes from an intervention to increase afterschool programs' (ASPs) achievement of healthy eating and physical activity (HE-PA) Standards. Ten intervention ASPs implemented the Strategies-To-Enhance-Practice (STEPs), a multi-component, adaptive intervention framework identifying factors essential to meeting HE-PA Standards, while 10 control ASPs continued routine practice. All programs, intervention and control, were assigned a STEPs for HE-PA index score based on implementation. Mixed-effects linear regressions showed high implementation ASPs had the greatest percentage of boys and girls achieving 30 min of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (47.3 and 29.3%), followed by low implementation ASPs (41.3 and 25.0%), and control ASPs (34.8 and 18.5%). For healthy eating, high/low implementation programs served fruits and vegetables an equivalent number of days, but more days than control programs (74.0 and 79.1% of days versus 14.2%). A similar pattern emerged for the percent of days sugar-sweetened foods and beverages were served, with high and low implementation programs serving sugar-sweetened foods (8.0 and 8.4% of days versus 52.2%), and beverages (8.7 and 2.9% of days versus 34.7%) equivalently, but less often than control programs. Differences in characteristics and implementation of STEPs for HE-PA between high/low implementers were also identified.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 114 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 11%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 28 25%
Unknown 34 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 15%
Social Sciences 16 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 13%
Sports and Recreations 8 7%
Psychology 7 6%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 43 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,553,899
of 23,900,102 outputs
Outputs from Health Education Research
#531
of 1,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,747
of 392,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Education Research
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,900,102 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,174 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.