↓ Skip to main content

Risk of endometrial cancer in asymptomatic postmenopausal patients with thickened endometrium: data from the FAME-Endo study: an observational register study

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Risk of endometrial cancer in asymptomatic postmenopausal patients with thickened endometrium: data from the FAME-Endo study: an observational register study
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00404-018-4885-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lukas Hefler, Judith Lafleur, Sonja Kickmaier, Heinz Leipold, Carmen Siebenhofer, Barbara Tringler, Christian Schauer, Alexandra Ciresa-König, Alexander Reinthaller

Abstract

To evaluate the risk for endometrial cancer (EC) in a large series of asymptomatic patients with thickened endometrium at ultrasound examination based on previously published data of a theoretical cohort. In a prospective register study, a total of 1024 women with thickened endometrium in ultrasound examination undergoing histological diagnosis by dilation, hysteroscopy and curettage were evaluated. 124 patients were excluded due to current medication with tamoxifen and/or presence of HNPCC leaving 900 patients for further analysis. Mean [standard deviation (SD)] age of patients was 65.6 (8.6) years. Mean (SD) endometrial thickness was 11.9 (5.8) mm. 32 and 6 cases of EC and complex endometrial hyperplasia with atypia were found, respectively. In the univariate analysis, a statistically significant association between endometrial thickness, current use of antihypertensive medication, number of deliveries, and the presence of endometrial fluid in preoperative vaginal ultrasound (p < 0.05) with EC was found. A multivariate logistic regression model incorporating these parameters showed a statistically significant independent association of endometrial thickness, number of deliveries, and the presence of endometrial fluid in preoperative vaginal ultrasound (p < 0.05), but not current use of antihypertensive medication, with EC. Using a cut-off of the endometrial thickness of > 11 mm, the risk for "EC alone" and "EC and complex endometrial hyperplasia with atypia combined" was found to be 6.7% and 7.9%, respectively. Our data compare favorably to a theoretical cohort suggesting a clinically reasonable cut-off of > 11 mm endometrial thickness to discriminate between "normal" and "pathological". The data regarding "risk for endometrial cancer" can be used for counseling affected women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 15 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unknown 15 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,997,590
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#1,009
of 2,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#213,597
of 336,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
#13
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.