↓ Skip to main content

Gold nanoparticles as multimodality imaging agents for brain gliomas

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanobiotechnology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Gold nanoparticles as multimodality imaging agents for brain gliomas
Published in
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, November 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12951-015-0140-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sheng-Feng Lai, Bai-Hung Ko, Chia-Chi Chien, Chia-Ju Chang, Shun-Ming Yang, Hsiang-Hsin Chen, Cyril Petibois, Dueng-Yuan Hueng, Shuk-Man Ka, Ann Chen, G. Margaritondo, Y. Hwu

Abstract

Nanoparticles can be used for targeted drug delivery, in particular for brain cancer therapy. However, this requires a detailed analysis of nanoparticles from the associated microvasculature to the tumor, not easy because of the required high spatial resolution. The objective of this study is to demonstrate an experimental solution of this problem, based in vivo and post-mortem whole organ imaging plus nanoscale 3-dimensional (3D) X-ray microscopy. The use of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) as contrast agents paved the way to a detailed high-resolution three dimensional (3D) X-ray and fluorescence imaging analysis of the relation between xenografted glioma cells and the tumor-induced angiogenic microvasculature. The images of the angiogenic microvessels revealed nanoparticle leakage. Complementary tests showed that after endocytotic internalization fluorescent AuNPs allow the visible-light detection of cells. AuNP-loading of cells could be extended from the case presented here to other imaging techniques. In our study, they enabled us to (1) identify primary glioma cells at inoculation sites in mice brains; (2) follow the subsequent development of gliomas. (3) Detect the full details of the tumor-related microvasculature; (4) Finding leakage of AuNPs from the tumor-related vasculature, in contrast to no leakage from normal vasculature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 22%
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 14%
Engineering 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2015.
All research outputs
#14,241,439
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#505
of 1,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,928
of 386,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#10
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,418 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.