↓ Skip to main content

Physiological Responses to Exercise at Altitude

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
134 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
309 Mendeley
Title
Physiological Responses to Exercise at Altitude
Published in
Sports Medicine, October 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200838010-00001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert S. Mazzeo

Abstract

Studies performed over the past decade have yielded new information related to the physiological and metabolic adjustments made in response to both short- and long-term high-altitude exposure. These investigations have examined the potential mechanisms responsible for the alterations observed in such key variables as heart rate, stroke volume, cardiac output, muscle blood flow, substrate utilization and mitochondrial function, both at rest and during exercise of varying intensities. Additionally, the occurrence and mechanisms related to the 'lactate paradox' continues to intrigue investigators. It is apparent that exposure to high altitude is an environmental stressor that elicits a robust sympathoadrenal response that contributes to many of the critical adjustments and adaptations mentioned above. Furthermore, as some of these important physiological adaptations are known to enhance performance, it has become popular to incorporate an aspect of altitude living/training into the training regimens of endurance athletes (e.g. 'live high-train low'). Finally, it is important to note that many factors influence the extent to which individuals adjust and adapt to the stress imposed by exposure to high altitude. Included among these are (i) the degree of hypoxia; (ii) the duration of exposure to hypoxic conditions; (iii) the exercise intensity (absolute vs relative workload); and (iv) the inter-individual variability in adapting to hypoxic environments ('responders' vs 'non-responders').

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 309 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Spain 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 297 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 67 22%
Student > Master 51 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 12%
Researcher 26 8%
Professor 11 4%
Other 51 17%
Unknown 65 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 125 40%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 3%
Other 24 8%
Unknown 74 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#2,611
of 2,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,863
of 191,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#655
of 785 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 785 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.