↓ Skip to main content

Internet, home-based cognitive and strategy training with older adults: a study to assess gains to daily life

Overview of attention for article published in Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Internet, home-based cognitive and strategy training with older adults: a study to assess gains to daily life
Published in
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40520-015-0496-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sinéad M. Hynes

Abstract

Computerised training has been shown to benefit cognitive function in older adults but rarely, if ever, enhances performance in everyday life. This study examines how an entirely internet-based cognitive programme can generalise to daily functioning. This is an exploratory study (n = 25) of computer and video-based strategy training with older adults that was conducted over the internet to facilitate generalisation. Results found no evidence of gains to measures in daily functioning. The only training benefits were on tasks that had been trained. The results suggest that not all training procedures produce benefits and a lack of transfer to daily life was evident here. Caution should be taken in interpretation due to the small sample under investigation. This research may be useful for the design and conduct of future rehabilitation studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 13 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 12%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Sports and Recreations 4 8%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,714,565
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#646
of 1,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,833
of 392,477 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
#9
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,867 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,477 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.