↓ Skip to main content

Two mutations in the vif gene of maedi-visna virus have different phenotypes, indicating more than one function of Vif

Overview of attention for article published in Virology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Two mutations in the vif gene of maedi-visna virus have different phenotypes, indicating more than one function of Vif
Published in
Virology, November 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.virol.2015.10.035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sigrídur R. Franzdóttir, Katrín Ólafsdóttir, Stefán R. Jónsson, Hannah Strobel, Ólafur S. Andrésson, Valgerdur Andrésdóttir

Abstract

Like most other lentiviruses, maedi-visna virus (MVV) requires Vif for replication in natural target cells and in vivo. Here, we show that Vif-deficient MVV accumulates G-A mutations in the sequence context characteristic of ovine APOBEC3, consistent with a role of MVV Vif in neutralizing APOBEC3. We studied two point mutations in the vif gene of MVV. One was a tryptophan to arginine mutation that affects the interaction with APOBEC3 and caused G-A hypermutation. The other mutation was a proline to serine mutation that together with a mutation in the capsid protein caused attenuated replication in fetal ovine synovial (FOS) cells but not in sheep choroid plexus (SCP) cells. There was no hypermutation associated with this mutation. These results suggest that MVV Vif exerts more than one function and that there may be interaction between Vif and the capsid. The results also suggest the involvement of an unknown host factor in MVV Vif function.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Unknown 7 35%