↓ Skip to main content

Linking in Vitro Effects and Detected Organic Micropollutants in Surface Water Using Mixture-Toxicity Modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science & Technology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Linking in Vitro Effects and Detected Organic Micropollutants in Surface Water Using Mixture-Toxicity Modeling
Published in
Environmental Science & Technology, November 2015
DOI 10.1021/acs.est.5b04083
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peta A. Neale, Selim Ait-Aissa, Werner Brack, Nicolas Creusot, Michael S. Denison, Björn Deutschmann, Klára Hilscherová, Henner Hollert, Martin Krauss, Jiří Novák, Tobias Schulze, Thomas-Benjamin Seiler, Helene Serra, Ying Shao, Beate I. Escher

Abstract

Surface water can contain countless organic micropollutants, and targeted chemical analysis alone may only detect a small fraction of the chemicals present. Consequently, bioanalytical tools can be applied complementary to chemical analysis to detect the effect of complex chemical mixtures. In this study, bioassays indicative of activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), activation of the pregnane X receptor (PXR), activation of the estrogen receptor (ER), adaptive stress responses to oxidative stress (Nrf2), genotoxicity (p53) and inflammation (NF-κB) and fish embryo toxicity were applied along with chemical analysis to water extracts from the Danube River. Mixture toxicity modeling was applied to determine the contribution of detected chemicals to the biological effect. Effect concentrations for between 0 to 13 detected chemicals could be found in the literature for the different bioassays. Detected chemicals explained less than 0.2% of the biological effect in the PXR activation, adaptive stress response and fish embryo toxicity assays, while five chemicals explained up to 80% of ER activation and three chemicals explained up to 71% of AhR activation. This study highlights the importance of fingerprinting the effects of detected chemicals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 146 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 22%
Student > Master 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 30 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 51 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 12%
Chemistry 10 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Engineering 7 5%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 41 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2017.
All research outputs
#4,645,495
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#5,313
of 20,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,443
of 274,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#66
of 228 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 20,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 228 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.