You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A functional model for characterizing long‐distance movement behaviour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/2041-210x.12465 |
| Authors |
Frances E. Buderman, Mevin B. Hooten, Jacob S. Ivan, Tanya M. Shenk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Colombia | 1 | 7% |
| Denmark | 1 | 7% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 37 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 27 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 78 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 33 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 1% |
| Engineering | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,267,597
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#1,069
of 2,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,723
of 294,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#14
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.