You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Environmental Factors Controlling the Distribution of Symbiodinium Harboured by the Coral Acropora millepora on the Great Barrier Reef
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0025536 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Timothy F. Cooper, Ray Berkelmans, Karin E. Ulstrup, Scarla Weeks, Ben Radford, Alison M. Jones, Jason Doyle, Marites Canto, Rebecca A. O'Leary, Madeleine J. H. van Oppen |
| Abstract |
The Symbiodinium community associated with scleractinian corals is widely considered to be shaped by seawater temperature, as the coral's upper temperature tolerance is largely contingent on the Symbiodinium types harboured. Few studies have challenged this paradigm as knowledge of other environmental drivers on the distribution of Symbiodinium is limited. Here, we examine the influence of a range of environmental variables on the distribution of Symbiodinium associated with Acropora millepora collected from 47 coral reefs spanning 1,400 km on the Great Barrier Reef (GBR), Australia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 173 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 24% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 19% |
| Researcher | 32 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Unknown | 31 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 90 | 48% |
| Environmental Science | 29 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Psychology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Unknown | 38 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2011.
All research outputs
#18,301,870
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#153,700
of 193,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,290
of 141,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,180
of 2,661 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,661 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.