↓ Skip to main content

Immune-Related Adverse Events in Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Current Rheumatology Reports, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Immune-Related Adverse Events in Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Published in
Current Rheumatology Reports, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11926-018-0770-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabina Sandigursky, Adam Mor

Abstract

With the advent of cancer immunotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors, patients with malignancies can now achieve durable remissions for conditions previously described as terminal. However, immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with cancer immunotherapy have become an anticipated consequence of enhanced T cell activation. Through an extensive literature review, we assess the most recent clinical and basic research data concerning immune checkpoint blockade and describe the spectrum of associated irAEs as well as their management. Anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies are widely used in the management of an array of tumors with incredible clinical remissions. However, irAEs cause significant morbidity and mortality and in some cases, result in withdrawal of cancer therapy and initiation of immunosuppression. While this is an exciting time in oncology, irAEs are a barrier to adequate care and therefore deserve close attention and improved capacity to predict and prevent toxicity. Rheumatologists should be familiar with these topics in the eventuality of patient evaluation and management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 18%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,533,292
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Current Rheumatology Reports
#648
of 718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,685
of 336,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Rheumatology Reports
#14
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.