| Title |
Tularemia after a dormouse bite in Switzerland
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, April 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10096-005-1322-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. Friedl, I. Heinzer, H. Fankhauser |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lithuania | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 21% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2007.
All research outputs
#4,706,990
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#420
of 2,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,391
of 57,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.