↓ Skip to main content

Red blood cell distribution width as a related factor of pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with systemic sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Rheumatology, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Red blood cell distribution width as a related factor of pulmonary arterial hypertension in patients with systemic sclerosis
Published in
Clinical Rheumatology, November 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10067-017-3918-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiuliang Zhao, Hongnan Mo, Xiaoxiao Guo, Qian Wang, Dong Xu, Yong Hou, Zhuang Tian, Yongtai Liu, Hui Wang, Jinzhi Lai, Mengtao Li, Xiaofeng Zeng

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the utility of red blood cell distribution width (RDW) as a simple and readily available marker of occurrence of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). One hundred and forty-five consecutive patients with SSc were recruited to the single-center cross-sectional study. Demographic characteristics, hematological parameters, Modified Rodnan Skin Score, and World Health Organization functional classification were determined. Diagnosis of PAH was based on screening by echocardiography and was confirmed by right heart catheterization. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) was diagnosed based on chest high-resolution computed tomography findings. There were no significant differences in gender, age, or disease duration between limited and diffused SSc groups. PAH was detected in 28 of lcSSc (33.3%) and 14 of dcSSc (23.0%) subjects. Patients with higher RDW values were more likely to be men with high anti-u1RNP titers and PAH. A significant correlation was found between RDW and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (p = 0.375, p < 0.01) and the diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (ρ = - 0.396, p < 0.01). The SSc-PAH group had significantly higher RDW values compared to the SSc group without pulmonary disease (15.7 ± 2.2 and 13.7 ± 1.0, p < 0.001). The mean RDW in the SSc-PAH-ILD group was significantly higher than that in the SSc-ILD group (16.3 ± 2.2% and 14.0 ± 1.5%, p < 0.001). Besides the recognized risk factors, high RDW was an independent predictor of PAH in patients with SSc (OR = 3.314 [95%CI 1.038-10.580], p < 0.05). RDW may be a related factor for identifying the pulmonary arterial hypertension in SSc patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 12%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 14 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Engineering 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 14 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2018.
All research outputs
#18,649,291
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Rheumatology
#2,371
of 3,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,877
of 438,174 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Rheumatology
#32
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,174 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.