↓ Skip to main content

Is cloned code really stable?

Overview of attention for article published in Empirical Software Engineering, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Is cloned code really stable?
Published in
Empirical Software Engineering, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10664-017-9528-y
Authors

Manishankar Mondal, Md Saidur Rahman, Chanchal K. Roy, Kevin A. Schneider

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 31%
Student > Master 8 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 21 58%
Engineering 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2019.
All research outputs
#17,989,170
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Empirical Software Engineering
#559
of 710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#225,068
of 313,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Empirical Software Engineering
#14
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 710 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.