↓ Skip to main content

Cost-of-Illness Studies

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
4 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
233 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
Title
Cost-of-Illness Studies
Published in
PharmacoEconomics, December 2012
DOI 10.2165/00019053-200624090-00005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ebere Akobundu, Jing Ju, Lisa Blatt, C. Daniel Mullins

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 119 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 20%
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 9 7%
Other 20 16%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 34%
Social Sciences 12 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Psychology 6 5%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 23 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,863,855
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics
#247
of 1,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,559
of 289,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics
#13
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.