↓ Skip to main content

Community Health and Employee Work Performance in the American Manufacturing Environment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Community Health, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Community Health and Employee Work Performance in the American Manufacturing Environment
Published in
Journal of Community Health, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s10900-018-0570-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan McHugh, Dustin D. French, Diane Farley, Claude R. Maechling, Dorothy D. Dunlop, Jane L. Holl

Abstract

Although better community health has long been assumed to be good for local businesses, evidence demonstrating the relationship between community health and employee performance is quite limited. Drawing on human resources data on 6103 employees from four large US manufacturing plants, we found that employees living in counties with poor community health outcomes had considerably higher rates of absenteeism and tardiness (ABT). For example, in one company, employees living in communities with high rates of children on free or reduced lunch had higher rates of ABT compared to other employees [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.52-3.04], and employees living in communities with high rates of drug overdose deaths had higher rates of ABT (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.29-1.77). In one plant, the annual value of lost wages due to ABT was over $1.3 million per year. Employees reported that poor community health (e.g., poverty, caregiving burdens, family dysfunction, drug use) resulted in "mental stress" leading to distraction, poor job performance, and more rarely, lapses in safety. These findings bolster the case for greater private sector investment in community health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Researcher 3 5%
Student > Master 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 29 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 9 16%
Social Sciences 7 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 29 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,503,729
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Community Health
#159
of 1,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,003
of 336,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Community Health
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,158 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.