Title |
Non-native plants affect generalist pollinator diet overlap and foraging behavior indirectly, via impacts on native plant abundance
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biological Invasions, May 2018
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10530-018-1767-3 |
Authors |
Sandra Gillespie, Elizabeth Elle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 21% |
Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 15% |
Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 49% |
Environmental Science | 14 | 21% |
Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2018.
All research outputs
#18,649,291
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#2,081
of 2,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,933
of 331,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#53
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.