| Title |
Cratering Chronology and the Evolution of Mars
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Space Science Reviews, April 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1011945222010 |
| Authors |
William K. Hartmann, Gerhard Neukum |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 288 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 6 | 2% |
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| Italy | 3 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 264 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 26% |
| Researcher | 48 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 14% |
| Unknown | 47 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 151 | 52% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 35 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 24 | 8% |
| Unknown | 60 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#533
of 1,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,511
of 43,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.