↓ Skip to main content

Individual variation of daily torpor and body mass change during winter in the large Japanese field mouse (Apodemus speciosus)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology B, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Individual variation of daily torpor and body mass change during winter in the large Japanese field mouse (Apodemus speciosus)
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology B, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00360-018-1179-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takeshi Eto, Shinsuke H. Sakamoto, Yoshinobu Okubo, Yasuhiro Tsuzuki, Chihiro Koshimoto, Tetsuo Morita

Abstract

Daily torpor is a strategy used by some overwintering small endotherms to aid in energy conservation. However, the pattern of torpor varies among individuals within species and populations, even under the same environmental conditions, with significant implications for survival rate and reproductive success. Body mass is one factor that may influence this variation, especially in some small mammals that accumulate fat stores prior to overwintering. However, to our knowledge there has been no previous study examining the detailed relationships between torpor expression and body mass change in small mammals that hoard food as an energy resource during winter. The large Japanese field mouse, Apodemus speciosus, whose winter survival strategy depends on food caches instead of fat stores, displays daily torpor under artificial winter conditions (short-day photoperiod and cold). The present study clarifies the characteristics and patterns of daily torpor and body mass change in this species in the laboratory. Although expression of daily torpor was facilitated progressively as in other species, the observed patterns of torpor expression and body mass change showed considerable individual variation. Moreover, there was no obvious correlation between body mass and daily torpor expression. Therefore, it is suggested that in A. speciosus body mass may not contribute to individual variation of daily torpor during winter. Daily torpor during winter may be adjusted by not only mechanisms common to other small mammals, but also species-specific factors relating to the external or internal reserves of energy in small mammals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Other 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 54%
Environmental Science 2 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2019.
All research outputs
#16,584,772
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#533
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,086
of 339,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.