↓ Skip to main content

Refining the phenotype associated with GNB1 mutations: Clinical data on 18 newly identified patients and review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Refining the phenotype associated with GNB1 mutations: Clinical data on 18 newly identified patients and review of the literature
Published in
American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, September 2018
DOI 10.1002/ajmg.a.40472
Pubmed ID
Authors

Parisa Hemati, Anya Revah‐Politi, Haim Bassan, Slavé Petrovski, Colleen G. Bilancia, Keri Ramsey, Nicole G. Griffin, Louise Bier, Megan T. Cho, Monica Rosello, Sally Ann Lynch, Sophie Colombo, Astrid Weber, Marte Haug, Erin L. Heinzen, Tristan T. Sands, Vinodh Narayanan, Michelle Primiano, Vimla S. Aggarwal, Francisca Millan, Shannon G. Sattler‐Holtrop, Alfonso Caro‐Llopis, Nir Pillar, Janice Baker, Rebecca Freedman, Hester Y. Kroes, Stephanie Sacharow, Nick Stong, Pablo Lapunzina, Michael C. Schneider, Nancy J. Mendelsohn, Amanda Singleton, Valerie Loik Ramey, Karen Wou, Alla Kuzminsky, Sandra Monfort, Monika Weisz Hubshman, Samantha Doyle, Alejandro Iglesias, Francisco Martinez, Fiona Mckenzie, Carmen Orellana, Koen L.I. van Gassen, Maria Palomares, Lily Bazak, Andy Lee, Ana Bircher, Lina Basel‐Vanagaite, Maria Hafström, Gunnar Houge, C4RCD Research Group, DDD study, David B. Goldstein, Kwame Anyane‐Yeboa

Abstract

De novo germline mutations in GNB1 have been associated with a neurodevelopmental phenotype. To date, 28 patients with variants classified as pathogenic have been reported. We add 18 patients with de novo mutations to this cohort, including a patient with mosaicism for a GNB1 mutation who presented with a milder phenotype. Consistent with previous reports, developmental delay in these patients was moderate to severe, and more than half of the patients were non-ambulatory and nonverbal. The most observed substitution affects the p.Ile80 residue encoded in exon 6, with 28% of patients carrying a variant at this residue. Dystonia and growth delay were observed more frequently in patients carrying variants in this residue, suggesting a potential genotype-phenotype correlation. In the new cohort of 18 patients, 50% of males had genitourinary anomalies and 61% of patients had gastrointestinal anomalies, suggesting a possible association of these findings with variants in GNB1. In addition, cutaneous mastocytosis, reported once before in a patient with a GNB1 variant, was observed in three additional patients, providing further evidence for an association to GNB1. We will review clinical and molecular data of these new cases and all previously reported cases to further define the phenotype and establish possible genotype-phenotype correlations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 18%
Researcher 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Librarian 2 5%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 11 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Neuroscience 7 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 16%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2018.
All research outputs
#20,739,552
of 25,477,125 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A
#2,946
of 4,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,672
of 346,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A
#48
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,477,125 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,439 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.