| Title |
Foreground Focus: Unsupervised Learning from Partially Matching Images
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Computer Vision, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11263-009-0252-y |
| Authors |
Yong Jae Lee, Kristen Grauman |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Finland | 2 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 46% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 18% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 41 | 72% |
| Engineering | 7 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,411,203
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Vision
#390
of 1,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,646
of 111,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Vision
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,124 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,685 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.