↓ Skip to main content

Physician Preferences and Variations in Prescription of Biologic Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Register‐Based Study of 4,010 Patients in Sweden

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Care & Research, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physician Preferences and Variations in Prescription of Biologic Drugs for Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Register‐Based Study of 4,010 Patients in Sweden
Published in
Arthritis Care & Research, November 2015
DOI 10.1002/acr.22640
Pubmed ID
Authors

Almina Kalkan, Magnus Husberg, Eva Hallert, Kerstin Roback, Ingrid Thyberg, Thomas Skogh, Per Carlsson

Abstract

Objective The prescription of biological drugs for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients has varied considerably across different regions. Previous studies have shown physician preferences to be an important determinant in the decision to select biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) rather than non-biologic, synthetic DMARDs (sDMARDs) alone. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that physician preferences are an important determinant for prescribing bDMARDs for RA patients in Sweden. Methods Using data from the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register, we identified 4010 RA patients who were not prescribed bDMARDs during the period 2008-2012, but who, on at least one occasion, had an sDMARD prescription and changed treatment for the first time to either a new sDMARD or a bDMARD. Physician preference for the use of bDMARDs was calculated using data on each physician's prescriptions during the study period. The relationship between prescription of a bDMARD and physician preference, controlling for patient characteristics, disease activity and the physician's local context was evaluated using multivariate logistic regression. Results When adjusting for patient characteristics, disease activity and the physician's local context, physician preference was an important predictor for prescription of bDMARDs. Compared with patients of a physician in the lowest preference tertile, patients of physicians in the highest and middle tertiles had an odds ratio for receiving bDMARD of 2.8 (95% CI 2.13-3.68) and 1.28 (95% CI 1.05-1.57), respectively. Conclusion Physician preference is an important determinant for prescribing bDMARDs. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Student > Master 7 18%
Researcher 6 15%
Other 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2016.
All research outputs
#19,995,718
of 24,571,708 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Care & Research
#2,568
of 2,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,821
of 396,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Care & Research
#32
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,571,708 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,893 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.