↓ Skip to main content

Brain Machine Interfaces for Vision Restoration: The Current State of Cortical Visual Prosthetics

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 1,320)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
179 news outlets
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Brain Machine Interfaces for Vision Restoration: The Current State of Cortical Visual Prosthetics
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13311-018-0660-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Soroush Niketeghad, Nader Pouratian

Abstract

Loss of vision alters the day to day life of blind individuals and may impose a significant burden on their family and the economy. Cortical visual prosthetics have been shown to have the potential of restoring a useful degree of vision via stimulation of primary visual cortex. Due to current advances in electrode design and wireless power and data transmission, development of these prosthetics has gained momentum in the past few years and multiple sites around the world are currently developing and testing their designs. In this review, we briefly outline the visual prosthetic approaches and describe the history of cortical visual prosthetics. Next, we focus on the state of the art of cortical visual prosthesis by briefly explaining the design of current devices that are either under development or in the clinical testing phase. Lastly, we shed light on the challenges of each design and provide some potential solutions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 148 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 21%
Student > Bachelor 28 19%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 44 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 31 21%
Neuroscience 23 16%
Computer Science 8 5%
Psychology 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 5%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 54 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1357. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2023.
All research outputs
#9,593
of 25,791,495 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#2
of 1,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148
of 449,496 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,495 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,496 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.