↓ Skip to main content

The regulation of transnational higher education in Southeast Asia: Case studies of Hong Kong, Malaysia and Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Higher Education, July 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
Title
The regulation of transnational higher education in Southeast Asia: Case studies of Hong Kong, Malaysia and Australia
Published in
Higher Education, July 2001
DOI 10.1023/a:1017572119543
Authors

Grant McBurnie, Christopher Ziguras

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Vietnam 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 124 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 24%
Student > Master 22 16%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Lecturer 8 6%
Other 33 24%
Unknown 18 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 54 40%
Business, Management and Accounting 18 13%
Arts and Humanities 12 9%
Linguistics 8 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 6%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 16 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Higher Education
#919
of 1,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,991
of 40,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Higher Education
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,671 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 40,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.