↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Susceptible period for cardiovascular complications in patients recovering from sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
21 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Susceptible period for cardiovascular complications in patients recovering from sepsis
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, September 2018
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.171284
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chih-Cheng Lai, Meng-Tse Gabriel Lee, Wan-Chien Lee, Christin Chih-Ting Chao, Tzu-Chun Hsu, Si-Huei Lee, Chien-Chang Lee

Abstract

Patients are at increased risk of cardiovascular complications while recovering from sepsis. We aimed to study the temporal change and susceptible periods for cardiovascular complications in patients recovering from sepsis by using a national database. In this retrospective population-based cohort study, patients with sepsis were identified from the National Health Insurance Research Database in Taiwan. We estimated the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke following sepsis by comparing a sepsis cohort to a matched population and hospital control cohort. The primary outcome was first occurrence of MI or stroke requiring admission to hospital during the 180-day period following discharge from hospital after sepsis. To delineate the risk profile over time, we plotted the weekly risk of MI and stroke against time using the Cox proportional hazards model. We determined the susceptible period by fitting the 2 phases of time-dependent risk curves with free-knot splines, which highlights the turning point of the risk of MI and stroke after discharge from the hospital. We included 42 316 patients with sepsis; stroke developed in 831 of these patients and MI developed in 184 within 180 days of discharge from hospital. Compared with population controls, patients recovering from sepsis had the highest risk for MI or stroke in the first week after discharge (hazard ratio [HR] 4.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.19 to 7.17; risk difference 0.0028, 95% CI 0.0021 to 0.0034), with the risk decreasing rapidly until the 28th day (HR 2.38, 95% CI 1.94 to 2.92; risk difference 0.0045, 95% CI 0.0035 to 0.0056) when the risk stabilized. In a repeated analysis comparing the sepsis cohort with the nonsepsis hospital control cohort, we found an attenuated but still marked elevated risk before day 36 after discharge (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.52; risk difference 0.0026, 95% CI 0.0013 to 0.0039). The risk of MI or stroke was found to interact with age, with younger patients being associated with a higher risk than older patients (interaction p = 0.0004). Compared with the general population with similar characteristics, patients recovering from sepsis had a markedly elevated risk of MI or stroke in the first 4 weeks after discharge from hospital. More close monitoring and pharmacologic prevention may be required for these patients at the specified time.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 14 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 15 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 174. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2019.
All research outputs
#203,243
of 23,510,717 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#378
of 8,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,541
of 337,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#12
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,510,717 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,895 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.