You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolutionary Quantitative Genomics of Populus trichocarpa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0142864 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ilga Porth, Jaroslav Klápště, Athena D. McKown, Jonathan La Mantia, Robert D. Guy, Pär K. Ingvarsson, Richard Hamelin, Shawn D. Mansfield, Jürgen Ehlting, Carl J. Douglas, Yousry A. El-Kassaby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 20% |
| Unknown | 10 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 7% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2016.
All research outputs
#16,681,672
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#147,948
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,006
of 399,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,794
of 5,028 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,028 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.