| Title |
Impact of Mental Health Services on Resilience in Youth with First Episode Psychosis: A Qualitative Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10488-015-0703-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Lal, M. Ungar, A. Malla, C. Leggo, M. Suto |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this qualitative study is to understand how mental health and related services support and hinder resilience in young people diagnosed with first-episode psychosis. Seventeen youth between the ages of 18-24 were recruited and 31 in-depth interviews were conducted. Findings illustrated that informational and meaning making, instrumental, and emotional supports were experienced positively (i.e., resilience-enhancing); whereas services with ghettoizing, engulfing, regulating, and out of tune practices were experienced negatively (i.e., resilience-hindering). These results demonstrate how various types of service-related practices influence resilience in youth and can inform future planning of services for psychosis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 38% |
| United States | 4 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 26 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 20 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 33 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,353,355
of 25,358,192 outputs
Outputs from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#115
of 713 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,284
of 400,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,358,192 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 713 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.