Title |
Nature of the coupling between neural drive and force-generating capacity in the human quadriceps muscle
|
---|---|
Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2015.1908 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
François Hug, Clément Goupille, Daniel Baum, Brent J. Raiteri, Paul W. Hodges, Kylie Tucker |
Abstract |
The force produced by a muscle depends on both the neural drive it receives and several biomechanical factors. When multiple muscles act on a single joint, the nature of the relationship between the neural drive and force-generating capacity of the synergistic muscles is largely unknown. This study aimed to determine the relationship between the ratio of neural drive and the ratio of muscle force-generating capacity between two synergist muscles (vastus lateralis (VL) and vastus medialis (VM)) in humans. Twenty-one participants performed isometric knee extensions at 20 and 50% of maximal voluntary contractions (MVC). Myoelectric activity (surface electromyography (EMG)) provided an index of neural drive. Physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) was estimated from measurements of muscle volume (magnetic resonance imaging) and muscle fascicle length (three-dimensional ultrasound imaging) to represent the muscles' force-generating capacities. Neither PCSA nor neural drive was balanced between VL and VM. There was a large (r = 0.68) and moderate (r = 0.43) correlation between the ratio of VL/VM EMG amplitude and the ratio of VL/VM PCSA at 20 and 50% of MVC, respectively. This study provides evidence that neural drive is biased by muscle force-generating capacity, the greater the force-generating capacity of VL compared with VM, the stronger bias of drive to the VL. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 14% |
Australia | 4 | 11% |
France | 4 | 11% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 11% |
Spain | 2 | 6% |
New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
India | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 18 | 51% |
Scientists | 14 | 40% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Qatar | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 124 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 25% |
Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
Researcher | 14 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 4% |
Other | 19 | 15% |
Unknown | 32 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Sports and Recreations | 22 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 16% |
Engineering | 12 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 5% |
Other | 18 | 14% |
Unknown | 41 | 32% |