↓ Skip to main content

Nature of the coupling between neural drive and force-generating capacity in the human quadriceps muscle

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nature of the coupling between neural drive and force-generating capacity in the human quadriceps muscle
Published in
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, November 2015
DOI 10.1098/rspb.2015.1908
Pubmed ID
Authors

François Hug, Clément Goupille, Daniel Baum, Brent J. Raiteri, Paul W. Hodges, Kylie Tucker

Abstract

The force produced by a muscle depends on both the neural drive it receives and several biomechanical factors. When multiple muscles act on a single joint, the nature of the relationship between the neural drive and force-generating capacity of the synergistic muscles is largely unknown. This study aimed to determine the relationship between the ratio of neural drive and the ratio of muscle force-generating capacity between two synergist muscles (vastus lateralis (VL) and vastus medialis (VM)) in humans. Twenty-one participants performed isometric knee extensions at 20 and 50% of maximal voluntary contractions (MVC). Myoelectric activity (surface electromyography (EMG)) provided an index of neural drive. Physiological cross-sectional area (PCSA) was estimated from measurements of muscle volume (magnetic resonance imaging) and muscle fascicle length (three-dimensional ultrasound imaging) to represent the muscles' force-generating capacities. Neither PCSA nor neural drive was balanced between VL and VM. There was a large (r = 0.68) and moderate (r = 0.43) correlation between the ratio of VL/VM EMG amplitude and the ratio of VL/VM PCSA at 20 and 50% of MVC, respectively. This study provides evidence that neural drive is biased by muscle force-generating capacity, the greater the force-generating capacity of VL compared with VM, the stronger bias of drive to the VL.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Unknown 124 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 25%
Student > Master 16 12%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 19 15%
Unknown 32 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 22 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 16%
Engineering 12 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 41 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,653,202
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#3,564
of 11,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,854
of 393,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#52
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.