Title |
Improving invasive species management by integrating priorities and contributions of scientists and decision makers
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ambio, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.1007/s13280-015-0723-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anouk N’Guyen, Philipp E. Hirsch, Irene Adrian-Kalchhauser, Patricia Burkhardt-Holm |
Abstract |
Managing invasive species is a major challenge for society. In the case of newly established invaders, rapid action is key for a successful management. Here, we develop, describe and recommend a three-step transdisciplinary process (the "butterfly model") to rapidly initiate action for invasion management. In the framing of a case study, we present results from the first of these steps: assessing priorities and contributions of both scientists and decision makers. Both scientists and decision makers prioritise research on prevention. The available scientific knowledge contributions, however, are publications on impacts rather than prevention of the invasive species. The contribution of scientific knowledge does thus not reflect scientists' perception of what is essentially needed. We argue that a more objective assessment and transparent communication of not only decision makers' but also scientists' priorities is an essential basis for a successful cooperation. Our three-step model can help achieve objectivity via transdisciplinary communication. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 76 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 17% |
Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Other | 12 | 15% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 27% |
Environmental Science | 19 | 24% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 20 | 26% |