↓ Skip to main content

Issues in Reproducible Simulation Research

Overview of attention for article published in Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Issues in Reproducible Simulation Research
Published in
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, September 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11538-018-0496-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. G. Fitzpatrick

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 22%
Student > Master 4 17%
Librarian 3 13%
Other 1 4%
Professor 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 3 13%
Social Sciences 3 13%
Mathematics 2 9%
Engineering 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 7 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,799,901
of 24,991,957 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#292
of 1,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,380
of 341,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
#12
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,991,957 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.