| Title |
Phylogenetic and ecological factors impact the gut microbiota of two Neotropical primate species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-015-3507-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katherine R. Amato, Rodolfo Martinez-Mota, Nicoletta Righini, Melissa Raguet-Schofield, Fabiana Paola Corcione, Elisabetta Marini, Greg Humphrey, Grant Gogul, James Gaffney, Elijah Lovelace, LaShanda Williams, Albert Luong, Maria Gloria Dominguez-Bello, Rebecca M. Stumpf, Bryan White, Karen E. Nelson, Rob Knight, Steven R. Leigh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 188 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 26% |
| Researcher | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 28 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 10 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2017.
All research outputs
#17,433,619
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#3,487
of 4,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,400
of 394,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#36
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 394,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.