You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Domestication to Crop Improvement: Genetic Resources for Sorghum and Saccharum (Andropogoneae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Botany, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1093/aob/mcm192 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sally L. Dillon, Frances M. Shapter, Robert J. Henry, Giovanni Cordeiro, Liz Izquierdo, L. Slade Lee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 390 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 11 | 3% |
| United States | 10 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Kenya | 2 | <1% |
| India | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Ethiopia | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 355 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 79 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 62 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 57 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 28 | 7% |
| Other | 63 | 16% |
| Unknown | 71 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 258 | 66% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | <1% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 4% |
| Unknown | 81 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,071,508
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#123
of 3,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,694
of 76,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#4
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.