You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of Simulation-Based Education to Improve Outcomes of Central Venous Catheterization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Academic medicine, September 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1097/acm.0b013e318226a204 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irene W. Y., Mary E. Brindle, Paul E. Ronksley, Diane L. Lorenzetti, Reg S. Sauve, William A. Ghali |
| Abstract |
Central venous catheterization (CVC) is increasingly taught by simulation. The authors reviewed the literature on the effects of simulation training in CVC on learner and clinical outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 48 | 29% |
| Unknown | 32 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 52% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 38 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Academic medicine
#5,767
of 6,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,502
of 136,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic medicine
#28
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.