↓ Skip to main content

TERT promoter mutations and rs2853669 polymorphism: prognostic impact and interactions with common alterations in glioblastomas

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
TERT promoter mutations and rs2853669 polymorphism: prognostic impact and interactions with common alterations in glioblastomas
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, November 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11060-015-1999-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Umberto Nencha, Amithys Rahimian, Marine Giry, Andrea Sechi, Karima Mokhtari, Marc Polivka, Yohann Schmitt, Anna-Luisa Di Stefano, Agusti Alentorn, Marianne Labussière, Marc Sanson

Abstract

TERT promoter (TERTp) mutation is the most common mutation in glioblastomas. It creates a putative binding site for Ets/TCF transcription factors, enhancing telomerase expression and activity, whereas the rs2853669 variant disrupts another Ets/TCF binding. We explore here the interaction between these two alterations, tumor genomic profile and the impact on prognosis. The TERTp and rs2853669 statuses were determined and confronted with the outcome and molecular profile, i.e., loss of chromosome 10q, CDKN2A deletion, IDH mutation, EGFR amplification, MGMT promoter methylation. 651 glioblastomas were selected (sex ratio = 1.35, median age 60.4 years, median survival 13.5 months). The TERTp mutation found in 481 patients (74 %) was independent from rs2853669 genotypes. TERTp mutation, but not rs2853669 status, was associated with older age (61.4 vs. 52.8 years). rs2853669 status had no impact on overall survival (OS) either in mutated TERTp or wild-type TERTp. Neither rs2736100 (TERT, 5q15.33) nor rs192011116 (TERC, 3q26.2) status had any impact on survival or showed any association with a TERTp mutation. The TERTp mutation was associated with EGFR amplification chromosome 10q loss, CDKN2A deletion and IDH wt. EGFR amplification was associated with a better outcome in TERTp mutated GBM, and a worse outcome in TERTp WT. This study-the largest analyzing the TERTp mutation and the rs2853669 polymorphism-fails to find any prognostic impact of rs2853669. It confirms the dual prognostic impact of EGFR amplification depending on TERTp status.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Professor 2 5%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 10 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 27%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Unknown 13 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2018.
All research outputs
#6,963,366
of 22,834,308 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#914
of 2,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,168
of 386,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#17
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,834,308 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,970 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 386,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.