↓ Skip to main content

ミルクアレルギー児におけるビオチン欠乏症の問題

Overview of attention for article published in Arerugī Allergy, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ミルクアレルギー児におけるビオチン欠乏症の問題
Published in
Arerugī Allergy, February 2017
DOI 10.15036/arerugi.60.1614
Authors

今井 孝成, 海老澤 元宏

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 14%
Unknown 6 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Lecturer 1 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Other 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 57%
Social Sciences 2 29%
Unknown 1 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Arerugī Allergy
#212
of 490 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273,723
of 430,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arerugī Allergy
#29
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 490 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.