↓ Skip to main content

High Mobility Group Box Protein 1 (HMGB1): The Prototypical Endogenous Danger Molecule

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Medicine, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
285 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
High Mobility Group Box Protein 1 (HMGB1): The Prototypical Endogenous Danger Molecule
Published in
Molecular Medicine, October 2015
DOI 10.2119/molmed.2015.00087
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huan Yang, Haichao Wang, Sangeeta S. Chavan, Ulf Andersson

Abstract

High mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) is an evolutionary ancient nuclear protein that exerts divergent biological tasks inside and outside of cells. The functions of HMGB1 depend on location, binding partners and redox states of the molecule. In the nucleus, HMGB1 organizes DNA and nucleosomes and regulates gene transcription. Upon cell activation or injury, nuclear HMGB1 can translocate to the cytoplasm, where it is involved in inflammasome activation and pyroptosis, as well as regulation of the autophagy/apoptosis balance. When actively secreted or passively released into the extracellular milieu, HMGB1 has cytokine, chemokine, neuroimmune and metabolic activities. Thus, HMGB1 plays multiple roles in the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases and mediates immune responses that range from inflammation and bacterial killing to tissue repair. HMGB1 has been associated with divergent clinical conditions such as sepsis, rheumatoid arthritis and atherosclerosis. HMGB1 initiates and perpetuates immune responses during infectious and sterile inflammation, as the archetypical alarmin and damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) molecule. We here describe advances in the understanding of HMGB1 biology with focus on recent findings of its mission as a DAMP in danger sensing and as a therapeutic target in inflammatory diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 205 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 21%
Student > Master 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 10 5%
Other 32 15%
Unknown 50 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 28 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 4%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 55 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,535,395
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Medicine
#313
of 1,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,357
of 286,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Medicine
#4
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,043 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.