↓ Skip to main content

Sentinels of inequity: examining policy requirements for equity-oriented primary healthcare

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Sentinels of inequity: examining policy requirements for equity-oriented primary healthcare
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, September 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12913-018-3501-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josée G. Lavoie, Colleen Varcoe, C. Nadine Wathen, Marilyn Ford-Gilboe, Annette J. Browne, On behalf of the EQUIP Research Team

Abstract

Non-government, not-for-profit community health centres (CHCs) play a crucial role within healthcare systems in fostering equity, acting both as direct providers of services and as sentinels of health and social inequity. In a study of an intervention to promote equity-oriented health care, we enlisted four diverse primary healthcare clinics with mandates to serve highly marginalized populations. All of these CHCs operate as not-for-profit, non-government organizations (NGOs), and have a marginal relationship financially and socially to other parts of the system. The purpose of this paper is to provide an analysis of the factors that shape how CHCs are able to carry out an equity mandate and, from this, to identify what is required at the level of policy to enhance capacity to provide equity-oriented health care. We systematically examined the clinics' policy and funding contexts, and identified influences on the clinics' capacities to promote equity-oriented health care. We identified three key mechanisms of influence, each playing out against the backdrop of a contested and marginal position of CHCs within the health care system: a) accountability and performance frameworks; b) patterns of funding and allocation of resources, and c) pathways for emergent priorities. We examine these mechanisms, considering how each influenced the pursuit of equity, and propose policy directions to optimize the primary health care sectors' capacity to support equity-oriented health care. Although this analysis is based on a study within a high-income country, we argue that because the dynamics between community health centres and broader healthcare systems are similar across national boundaries, the implications have applicability to low and middle-income countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 15%
Researcher 13 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 32 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 21 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 11%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 37 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,008,518
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#262
of 7,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,094
of 338,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#6
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.