| Title |
Theoretical Loss and Gambling Intensity (Revisited): A Response to Braverman et al. (2013)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Gambling Studies, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10899-014-9463-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Auer, Mark D. Griffiths |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 16% |
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 8 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2015.
All research outputs
#4,836,164
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#226
of 989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,783
of 241,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 989 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.