↓ Skip to main content

On the phylogenetic position of the Okinawa woodpecker (Sapheopipo noguchii)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ornithology, February 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
On the phylogenetic position of the Okinawa woodpecker (Sapheopipo noguchii)
Published in
Journal of Ornithology, February 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10336-004-0063-4
Authors

Hans Winkler, Nobuhiko Kotaka, Anita Gamauf, Franziska Nittinger, Elisabeth Haring

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 4%
Brazil 1 4%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 19%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 6 23%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 50%
Environmental Science 7 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Psychology 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,576,061
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ornithology
#705
of 1,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,767
of 59,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ornithology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,633 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them