↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Motor Control Exercises Versus Graded Activity in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Physical Therapy, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
32 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
184 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
733 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Motor Control Exercises Versus Graded Activity in Patients With Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Published in
Physical Therapy, December 2011
DOI 10.2522/ptj.20110290
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciana Gazzi Macedo, Jane Latimer, Christopher G. Maher, Paul W. Hodges, James H. McAuley, Michael K. Nicholas, Lois Tonkin, Chris J. Stanton, Tasha R. Stanton, Ryan Stafford

Abstract

Motor control exercises to improve control and coordination of trunk muscles and graded activity under the principles of cognitive-behavioral therapy are 2 commonly used exercise therapies, yet there is little evidence to support the use of one intervention over the other.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 733 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 <1%
Spain 4 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 715 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 130 18%
Student > Master 121 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 62 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 58 8%
Other 52 7%
Other 157 21%
Unknown 153 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 218 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 177 24%
Sports and Recreations 54 7%
Psychology 22 3%
Neuroscience 21 3%
Other 68 9%
Unknown 173 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,241,047
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Physical Therapy
#190
of 2,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,431
of 251,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Physical Therapy
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,800 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 251,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.