↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs Meropenem on 30-Day Mortality for Patients With E coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection and Ceftriaxone Resistance: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
549 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
807 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs Meropenem on 30-Day Mortality for Patients With E coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection and Ceftriaxone Resistance: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, September 2018
DOI 10.1001/jama.2018.12163
Pubmed ID
Authors

Patrick N A Harris, Paul A Tambyah, David C Lye, Yin Mo, Tau H Lee, Mesut Yilmaz, Thamer H Alenazi, Yaseen Arabi, Marco Falcone, Matteo Bassetti, Elda Righi, Benjamin A Rogers, Souha Kanj, Hasan Bhally, Jon Iredell, Marc Mendelson, Tom H Boyles, David Looke, Spiros Miyakis, Genevieve Walls, Mohammed Al Khamis, Ahmed Zikri, Amy Crowe, Paul Ingram, Nick Daneman, Paul Griffin, Eugene Athan, Penelope Lorenc, Peter Baker, Leah Roberts, Scott A Beatson, Anton Y Peleg, Tiffany Harris-Brown, David L Paterson

Abstract

Extended-spectrum β-lactamases mediate resistance to third-generation cephalosporins (eg, ceftriaxone) in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Significant infections caused by these strains are usually treated with carbapenems, potentially selecting for carbapenem resistance. Piperacillin-tazobactam may be an effective "carbapenem-sparing" option to treat extended-spectrum β-lactamase producers. To determine whether definitive therapy with piperacillin-tazobactam is noninferior to meropenem (a carbapenem) in patients with bloodstream infection caused by ceftriaxone-nonsusceptible E coli or K pneumoniae. Noninferiority, parallel group, randomized clinical trial included hospitalized patients enrolled from 26 sites in 9 countries from February 2014 to July 2017. Adult patients were eligible if they had at least 1 positive blood culture with E coli or Klebsiella spp testing nonsusceptible to ceftriaxone but susceptible to piperacillin-tazobactam. Of 1646 patients screened, 391 were included in the study. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam, 4.5 g, every 6 hours (n = 188 participants) or meropenem, 1 g, every 8 hours (n = 191 participants) for a minimum of 4 days, up to a maximum of 14 days, with the total duration determined by the treating clinician. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days after randomization. A noninferiority margin of 5% was used. Among 379 patients (mean age, 66.5 years; 47.8% women) who were randomized appropriately, received at least 1 dose of study drug, and were included in the primary analysis population, 378 (99.7%) completed the trial and were assessed for the primary outcome. A total of 23 of 187 patients (12.3%) randomized to piperacillin-tazobactam met the primary outcome of mortality at 30 days compared with 7 of 191 (3.7%) randomized to meropenem (risk difference, 8.6% [1-sided 97.5% CI, -∞ to 14.5%]; P = .90 for noninferiority). Effects were consistent in an analysis of the per-protocol population. Nonfatal serious adverse events occurred in 5 of 188 patients (2.7%) in the piperacillin-tazobactam group and 3 of 191 (1.6%) in the meropenem group. Among patients with E coli or K pneumoniae bloodstream infection and ceftriaxone resistance, definitive treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam compared with meropenem did not result in a noninferior 30-day mortality. These findings do not support use of piperacillin-tazobactam in this setting. anzctr.org.au Identifiers: ACTRN12613000532707 and ACTRN12615000403538 and ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02176122.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 782 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 807 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 807 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 116 14%
Researcher 100 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 8%
Student > Bachelor 63 8%
Student > Postgraduate 55 7%
Other 175 22%
Unknown 235 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 325 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 58 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 41 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 2%
Other 67 8%
Unknown 274 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 574. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#41,790
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#866
of 36,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#781
of 348,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#18
of 399 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,797 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 399 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.