↓ Skip to main content

American College of Cardiology

Aquapheresis Versus Intravenous Diuretics and Hospitalizations for Heart Failure

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Heart Failure, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
16 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
Title
Aquapheresis Versus Intravenous Diuretics and Hospitalizations for Heart Failure
Published in
JACC: Heart Failure, October 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jchf.2015.08.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Rosa Costanzo, Daniel Negoianu, Brian E. Jaski, Bradley A., James T. Heywood, Inder S. Anand, James M. Smelser, Alan M. Kaneshige, Don B. Chomsky, Eric D. Adler, Garrie J. Haas, James A. Watts, Jose L. Nabut, Michael P. Schollmeyer, Gregg C. Fonarow

Abstract

The AVOID-HF (Aquapheresis versus Intravenous Diuretics and Hospitalization for Heart Failure) trial tested the hypothesis that patients hospitalized for HF treated with adjustable ultrafiltration (AUF) would have a longer time to first HF event within 90 days after hospital discharge than those receiving adjustable intravenous loop diuretics (ALD). Congestion in hospitalized heart failure (HF) patients portends unfavorable outcomes. The AVOID-HF trial, designed as a multicenter, 1-to-1 randomized study of 810 hospitalized HF patients, was terminated unilaterally and prematurely by the sponsor (Baxter Healthcare, Deerfield, Illinois) after enrollment of 224 patients (27.5%). Aquadex FlexFlow System (Baxter Healthcare) was used for AUF. A Clinical Events Committee, blinded to the randomized treatment, adjudicated whether 90-day events were due to HF. A total of 110 patients were randomized to AUF and 114 to ALD. Baseline characteristics were similar. Estimated days to first HF event for the AUF and ALD group were, respectively, 62 and 34 (p = 0.106). At 30 days, compared with the ALD group, the AUF group had fewer HF and cardiovascular events. Renal function changes were similar. More AUF patients experienced an adverse effect of special interest (p = 0.018) and a serious study product-related adverse event (p = 0.026). The 90-day mortality was similar. Compared with the ALD group, the AUF group trended toward a longer time to first HF event within 90 days and fewer HF and cardiovascular events. More patients in the AUF group experienced special interest or serious product-related adverse event. Due to the trial's untimely termination, additional AUF investigation is warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 164 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Postgraduate 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 36 22%
Unknown 39 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 90 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 47 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#543,824
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Heart Failure
#134
of 1,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,207
of 295,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Heart Failure
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,582 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.