↓ Skip to main content

Research advances and gaps in marine planning: towards a global database in systematic conservation planning

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
5 blogs
twitter
57 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
244 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Research advances and gaps in marine planning: towards a global database in systematic conservation planning
Published in
Biological Conservation, November 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.06.027
Authors

Jorge G. Álvarez-Romero, Morena Mills, Vanessa M. Adams, Georgina G. Gurney, Robert L. Pressey, Rebecca Weeks, Natalie C. Ban, Jessica Cheok, Tammy E. Davies, Jon C. Day, Mélanie A. Hamel, Heather M. Leslie, Rafael A. Magris, Collin J. Storlie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 244 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 18%
Researcher 42 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 16%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Other 8 3%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 56 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 91 37%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 16%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 3%
Other 21 9%
Unknown 61 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2021.
All research outputs
#692,154
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#579
of 6,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,158
of 363,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#11
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.