| Title |
Prioritizing species, pathways, and sites to achieve conservation targets for biological invasion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-015-1013-1 |
| Authors |
Melodie A. McGeoch, Piero Genovesi, Peter J. Bellingham, Mark J. Costello, Chris McGrannachan, Andy Sheppard |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Ireland | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 386 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 78 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 65 | 16% |
| Unknown | 86 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 143 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 107 | 27% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Engineering | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 25 | 6% |
| Unknown | 106 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2020.
All research outputs
#2,786,729
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#411
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,511
of 398,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.